![]() |
| Photo credit |
Due to the recent doping scandal involving Lance
Armstrong, Nike has cut ties with the world famous cyclist.
In cases like this crisis management is highly important to convey accurate
facts and data to the general public and to specific publics in order to
prevent or minimize negative publicity that could impact the success of the
company. Nike reacted to the scandal by terminating the contract with Lance
Armstrong but stated that they will continue to support the “LiveStrong”
anti-cancer campaign founded by him (maintaining their image through corporate
responsibility). In a MA thesis approach one could compare best practise
examples to cases where crisis PR went horribly wrong and which factors and
techniques used by the companies/brands made the difference.
Each crisis situation is unique and needs a
tailored response, which makes it interesting to analyse how companies deal
with crisis situations in the era of social media, where mistakes and news
spread like wildfire. Companies must take into consideration that their
audiences are now highly fragmented, pulling the information they consider relevant
instead of filtering through what mainstream media throws at them. As a result,
crisis approaches pre-social media could be compared to crisis handling post-social
media, analysing whether social media is a helpful tool for PR practitioners
dealing with crisis situations or not.



